Should the higher earner pay more rent or mortgage?
Many couples worry that “pay more if you earn more” is unfair — or that 50/50 is unfair when incomes differ. The calm way through is to pick a rule that balances affordability and fairness: both people should have a sustainable leftover and a plan that still works under stress tests.
What “pay more” can mean
“Higher earner pays more” can mean different things. Some couples want equal leftovers (so the higher earner pays more). Some want equal contributions (50/50). Others want a stable, memorable rule (like 60/40). None of these are automatically right or wrong — what matters is that you agree it and it stays resilient.
A useful default is proportional splitting, because it tracks income changes automatically. But a custom split can be easier to live with if it’s close enough and reduces friction.
Worked examples (with numbers)
How to agree the rule without tension
- Start with proportional (it’s the cleanest baseline).
- Check if 50/50 is still comfortable for both.
- If you want stability, pick a custom split close to proportional (e.g. 60/40 or 70/30).
- Stress test it (+1%, +2%, and one-income) and agree a review trigger.